|
16356| 13
|
What about SQM Qos settings? |
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
|
| |
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
|
Comments
Seems to understand, my bypass is connected to the main route of the LAN port. Then I should set the upload = download speed limit of 90000
After I set it like this, is it normal for the speed to change from 12M/s to 10.5M/s at full speed???
There is also a question, that is, if I limit the download (that is, upload) speed, I will test the download speed
detail
Reply
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
Comments
reference
1. Multi-test, the network speed is unstable, not necessarily every time, and needs to be tested several times
2. Download speed (kbit/s) and upload speed (kbit/s) Go to Speedtest.net speed test, here the test speed = xx megabandwidth, for example, 100 megabytes; Your speed test download of 12MB/S should be the actual download
detail
Reply
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
Comments
The buffering you are talking about is exactly the problem that SOM is trying to solve, the so-called bufferbloat.
Assuming that the operator allocates 100M bandwidth to you, when you start downloading from a website, the speed is likely to soar to 150M until the buffer is exhausted, and then your traffic will be lost like crazy, so your latency will soar significantly.
detail
Reply
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
Comments | ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
| ||
|
Only talk about technology, not politics! (Click for details) | Respect each other, communicate friendly, do not overreact, and have a glass heart. Random input and flooding and other operations will be banned. |
||
If in doubt, add an admin QQ86788181|Mobile version|Little black room|Archiver|Enshan Wireless Forum (Changzhou Enshan Computer Development Co., Ltd.) ( The Soviet ICP is 05084872 number )
GMT+8, 2025-12-4 22:50
Powered by Discuz! X3.5
© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.
| 江苏省互联网有害信息举报中心 举报信箱:js12377 | @jischina.com.cn 举报电话:025-88802724
本站不良内容举报信箱:68610888@qq.com